SYSTEM_ENTRY
Build AI systems from primitives, not platforms.
A technical education platform for engineers who write agentic loops, memory handlers, and retrieval logic themselves. No visual builders. No framework lock-in. Just code.
FOUNDATION
IDENTITY
METHOD
CURRICULUM STRUCTURE
Not surface-level API calls.
The entire stack — from user-facing applications to training custom models on GPUs.
Real applications you code from scratch.
Each one isolates and teaches a critical layer of AI engineering.
Reverse-engineer the best apps. Break them down. Rebuild from primitives.
We deconstruct their architectures and rebuild them live in code.
Real-time building. Real-time debugging.
Not recorded tutorials — actual technical work sessions.
Deployment. Monitoring. MLOps. Evaluation systems.
Your code faces real users and real scale.
FOUNDATION
SCOPE
most people never get past layer one
each one with trade-offs
each one requiring deep understanding
RAG, MCP, embeddings, fine-tuning
RL, evals, drift, guardrails
and you need to understand how they all fit together
this isn't "learn to code"
this is systems engineering for the AI era
The AI job market is splitting.
MARKET
DIFFERENTIATION
TIER 1
Use ChatGPT. Use Cursor.
Know how to write prompts.
Think that makes them AI engineers.
It doesn't.
TIER 2
Build the tools.
Understand systems, not just APIs.
Ship to production.
Rare. Thus, valuable.
If you think prompting ChatGPT makes you AI-ready, you're grossly miscalculating your career risk.
REALITY
SKILL GAP
AUDIENCE
FIT
You know how to build systems.
Now learn how to build AI systems.
You need to understand what's actually possible.
And what's just hype.
You've done the tutorials.
You want depth.
Not demos. Not clones.
Production-grade software.
What's real. What's possible. What's bullshit.
You need to evaluate systems and architectures.
Not just read vendor marketing.
What you'll be able to say after this.
OUTCOMES
CAPABILITIES
I've built retrieval systems, multimodal pipelines, IDE-native agents, MCP servers, and agent runtimes from scratch.
I've reverse-engineered ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Cursor. I understand their architectures.
I've deployed AI systems to production with monitoring, evals, and drift detection.
I've trained language models, fine-tuned open weights, and run them on GPUs.
LENS_II
ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS
The fastest way to learn architecture is to dismantle systems that already work at scale.
Not to replicate them. To understand the constraints that shaped their design.
Every production AI system makes explicit trade-offs: conversation state, context management, retrieval versus generation, model orchestration, failure modes.
We deconstruct these systems live, then reconstruct the core patterns from first principles.
multi-turn conversation state
memory and tool execution
production model variants
search + reasoning fusion
retrieval pipelines
citation enforcement
whole-repo indexing
context selection
latency vs accuracy trade-offs
text-to-UI rendering
stateful components
structured output generation
code generation with context
file system operations
live execution environments
IDE-integrated suggestions
codebase-aware completions
multi-file context synthesis
Break systems into isolated components. Trace data flow across state boundaries and orchestration layers. Identify where architectural decisions are enforced and where they break down under load.
Understand how systems decide what enters the context window. Compression techniques, summarization strategies, selective truncation. Multi-model routing logic and graceful fallback chains.
Study real-time streaming mechanics and backpressure handling. Tool calling protocols, retry logic, rate limiting strategies. How systems fail and recover when facing production traffic.

Select a production system. Push it until it breaks. Form architectural hypotheses. Validate through experimentation. Rebuild the critical patterns from scratch.
Not replication. Comprehension.
You walk away understanding constraints, not just features. Why the system evolved into its current shape under real-world pressure.
LENS_III
MULTIMODAL ENGINEERING
Text completion is table stakes. The real world operates in images, audio, video, code, and structured data.
Most AI engineers never leave the text domain. They build chat interfaces and call it multimodal. That's a blind spot.
Production systems process vision transformers, diffusion models, speech pipelines, and code as structured input. Each modality has its own encoding, architecture, and failure modes.
We build systems that handle all of them. From first principles.
image analysis and interpretation
visual question answering
OCR and document understanding
text-to-image generation
diffusion model architectures
prompt engineering for visuals
code as structured modality
AST-aware suggestions
type system integration
speech-to-text pipelines
multilingual transcription
audio preprocessing
text-to-speech synthesis
voice cloning
prosody and emotion control
facial encoding and matching
embeddings for identity
privacy and bias considerations
frame extraction and analysis
temporal reasoning
action and event detection
text-to-video generation
temporal consistency models
motion and physics simulation
Vision transformers for image understanding. Diffusion models for generation — DALL-E, Stable Diffusion architectures. Video processing: frame extraction, temporal reasoning, action detection. Face recognition: encoding, matching, privacy. Computer vision fundamentals applied to production AI systems.
Whisper for speech-to-text: multilingual transcription, preprocessing pipelines. Text-to-speech with ElevenLabs: voice synthesis, prosody control. Audio classification and feature extraction. Real-time streaming and latency management for voice interfaces.
Code as a modality: ASTs, type systems, static analysis. Function calling and tool execution protocols. JSON schema enforcement for structured outputs. Validation, error handling, graceful degradation. Build systems that understand and generate precise, machine-parseable data.

Build each modality from scratch. Vision transformers. Diffusion pipelines. Speech models. Code parsers. Deploy them to production.
Not API wrappers. Actual architectures.
You walk away able to reason across modalities. Understand why systems choose one encoding over another. Build multimodal applications that handle the real world, not just text prompts.
LENS_IV
INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING

Production AI systems aren't just "model + prompt." They're built on specialized infrastructure.
Vector databases. Graph memory. Orchestration engines. Each one solves a specific problem. Each one has trade-offs.
You can't just "use Pinecone" and call it done. You need to understand when to use vector search vs keyword search vs hybrid. When graphs are better than vectors. How memory systems actually work. When to orchestrate with code vs orchestration frameworks. What these tools do under the hood.
This lens is about knowing the stack. Not abstractions. Actual infrastructure.
Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, Qdrant
embedding storage and similarity search
approximate vs exact nearest neighbor
indexing strategies and metadata filtering
Neo4j for entity relationships
knowledge graphs for structured memory
graph traversal with vector search
entity extraction and relationship modeling
LangChain and LangGraph for workflows
Temporal for durable execution
Composio for tool integration
code vs framework trade-offs
Mem0 for persistent user memory
context window management strategies
session state vs long-term storage
retrieval-augmented conversation
vector search + BM25 keyword search
result re-ranking and fusion strategies
semantic + lexical retrieval
when hybrid beats pure vector
HuggingFace, Replicate, Modal, RunPod
hosting models and GPU management
inference optimization techniques
cost vs latency trade-offs

We won't just "use" these tools. We'll build systems with them and understand their internals. Hands-on workshops with real infrastructure.
Comparative analysis. When do you choose Pinecone vs Weaviate? When is a graph better than vectors? We'll test and measure.
Every tool gets integrated into actual projects. No toy examples. Real architectures under real constraints.
LENS_V
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING

Building on localhost is one thing. Production is a completely different beast.
Most AI projects never make it to production:
This lens is about making AI reliable.
version every model release
monitor performance, drift, safety metrics
continuous evaluation at scale
track answer quality and citation accuracy
user satisfaction metrics
run evals on every prompt change
A/B testing prompts and models
response quality monitoring
real-time performance tracking
measure acceptance rates and code quality
user retention metrics
constant model and prompt iteration
Weights & Biases, MLflow, Arize
version prompts like code
catch drift before users notice
deployment pipelines and CI/CD
automated testing and validation
observability and debugging systems

Every project you build will get deployed. Not just "working on your machine." Real URLs. Real users. Real consequences.
Build monitoring dashboards. Track metrics that matter. Response quality. Latency. Cost. User satisfaction.
Run evals continuously. Automated evaluation suites. Testing prompt changes before they ship.
Implement guardrails. Content filtering. Output validation. Making sure AI doesn't do something catastrophic.
LENS_VI
FUNDAMENTAL UNDERSTANDING

This is the deepest layer. Where you stop being a consumer and become someone who actually understands the technology.
Most AI engineers never touch this layer. They treat models as magic black boxes:
That's a fundamental gap.
trained GPT-4 from scratch
fine-tuned for instruction-following and coding
safety alignment and evaluation
Constitutional AI and RLHF methodologies
alignment from first principles
training approaches for safety
Replit (code), Harvey (legal), Bloomberg (finance)
adapting models to specific domains
specialized performance vs general models
HuggingFace, EleutherAI, Stability AI
training and distributing models
democratizing model access
GPU infrastructure and CUDA optimization
memory management and inference speed
understanding hardware constraints
versioning, datasets, training pipelines
experiment tracking and MLflow
infrastructure behind open-source AI

Train your own language model (5M-50M parameters) from scratch. Understand tokenization, attention, and training dynamics. Not theory. Actual training runs.
Fine-tune open-weight models for specific tasks. Build RL training environments. Deploy models on GPUs. Optimize for inference speed and cost.
When you understand how models work: you make better architectural decisions, you know when to fine-tune vs prompt-engineer, you understand limitations deeply, you can evaluate properly.
This is the difference between using AI and understanding AI.
ACCESS
ENROLLMENT
Cohort 01 opens Q1 2026. Limited to engineers actively building production AI systems.
No video courses. No surface-level tutorials. Pure technical execution.